Monday, May 15, 2006

Intermission of Fragments II - On the Experience of the Eucharist

First my apologies. Although I made no commitments, I certainly gave you friends the expectation that this blog would be updated before this. This was my own sincere intention, but my recent massive upheaval has been attended by a lot of unexpected illness, making trips to local internet stations all-but-impossible till now.

Anyway, herewith a fragment regarding the Eucharist:


Recently in an Irish newspaper a letter appeared by a priest and psychotherapist. Within it, there was, for me at least, a single, most tantalising line:

"As a practicising psychoanalyst, I can tell you that the inner spiritual experience, for that is what happens as we take in the body and blood of Christ, is that something mysterious has just occurred spiritually."

And then unfortunately, the writer says nothing more on what the nature of that experience might be.

I find this unfortunate, because I find so very, very little in print as to what the quality of this EXPERIENCE of the Eucharist might be.

True, throughout the Christian tradition, we have a great deal of testimony as to what the Eucharist DOES, beginning with the words of Christ Jesus:

"For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him (John 6:56).

And then there is a great deal of testimony from the Church Fathers to the same effect.

Maximus the Confessor for example, says: "The Eucharist transforms the faithful into itself." That is, into the Body of Christ.

And St John Damascene writes: "The Bread of the Communion is not mere bread, but bread united with the Godhead."

For those Christians suspicious of ecclesial tradition, there is also the testimony of modern esoteric Christians. Though generally opposed to the Church, Rudolf Steiner for example, repeatedly emphasised the awesome nature of the transubtantiation of the bread and the wine.

And circa 1936, Valentin Tomberg wrote: "There is nothing in the physical world more holy - more healing in the deepest sense of that word - than the bread of the Communion Service."

But again, all of this speaks to what the Eucharist ***does*** - not how it is experienced.

Now we live in an era of psychotherapy and New Age pursuits, where spiritual and inner ***experience*** is addressed and expressed more than ever.

A great deal of the enormous appeal of the New Age movement, I believe, is that is engaged with the realm of the EXPERIENTIAL - rather than that of simply doctrine and belief.

And personally, I believe this New Age interest in experience, reflects the modern need of the human soul. That we have arrived at an epoch in human evolution, where this is now more necessary than ever.

This is not to negate the tremendous wealth and riches to be found in Christian tradition and doctrine. Regular readers will know I have little belief in the New Age tendency to throw out the tradition ...

Still, I feel that we Christians do need to speak more in terms of experience, in *addition* to doctrine.

Thus, I am sadly struck by how very little I see in print, about how we FEEL and SENSE the Holy Eucharist.

That single line from the psychotherapist-priest quoted above tantalises me, precisely because it speaks, again, to an "inner spiritual experience something mysterious has just occurred spiritually."

And such indications of the inner experience seem to me all too rare.

Tentatively then, I will simply try to voice my own experience.

What accompanies Holy Communion for me is a set of familiar and precious sensations, that are admittedly very hard to record.

Part of this difficulty lies in the fact that it is an experience, unlike any other that I have known outside of the Church.

If one has never tasted an apple, how to relate the sensation of "appleness"? We may say that the apple is sweet, we might describe a texture that crunches, but nothing we can say will really suffice to explain the true experience of the apple.

Something similar though far, far more profound might be said about Holy Communion.

Those who regularly receive it, or at least those who really pay sufficient attention to their experience, will know whereof I speak.

For those who do not, my words may seem next to useless.

Nonetheless, I will use such words as "wholesomeness" and "cleansing". I feel something very, very wholesome in receiving the Eucharist - wholesome in the most beautiful sense of that word.

And I feel something cleansing me and helping to keep my soul clean from darkness.

I also feel an element of union - a sense that I am joining or rejoining something far larger tham myself, something very, very rich.

And the sense of joining or rejoining belongs to one of the greatest riches of my life.

I go to Holy Communion as often as I can. Recently I nevertheless asked myself WHY I go as often as I do.

Clearly, all of the above came before my soul. Simply the sheer depth of joy and richness and meaning, I receive in participating in the Mass.

But something else came as well.

I said to myself: "I go to Mass, because it HUMANISES me".

What is this sense that I am humanised by the Mass? Is it simply a structure of belief, inasmuch as I believe that I have taken in a holy substance, or I believe that Christ is now abiding in me?

For me, it is much more than that.

As I observe my spiritual path over the years, I feel that, by the Grace of God, I become a more feeling, more conscientious, more humane and HUMAN being.

And as I look at this trajectory of grace, I cannot escape the deeply held sense, that trajectory is directly related to regularly receiving the grace of Holy Communion. Holy Communion IS Holy Communion. It is Communion with that which makes me ever more human ...

For me, this is not mere belief based on doctrine. It is a deeply felt conviction that I cannot shake ...


Here ends this fragment. So, so much more I want to say in time about the Eucharist in not only its individual, but also social and even political dimensions.

But this must wait.

At the moment, as I sit in an internet cafe in Southern Spain, I am still ill. And it is impossible for me to say when fragments at least, will start to reappear. I hope it will not be so long this time. But again, I cannot say.

Au Revoir, my friends,

Roger

6 comments:

Grey Owl said...

Glad to see you back, Roger. Spain sounds like a nice place to be. I know you will find the wisdom in your suffering. My prayers are with you.

Is one way of describing the experience of Holy Communion is the feeling of your true self without the burdens of world weariness? Recognizing yourself as part of the greater Spirit of God through Jesus?

Sun Warrior

Fred said...

You have my prayers!

Michael said...

Dear Roger,
I trust you are on the mend.
I have quite a few churches around my area; though it is not really a big city. It has given me the opportunity is get around them all and make comparisons. My early research suggests that Tomberg's observations of 1936 don't really hold good.
You must have been lucky with the churches you attend.

The stature of the priest is so important in the delivery of the Communion. At the Catholic Mass I attended last week, the congregation was large- over two hundred people. However, the sermon was mumbled and disjointed. There was hardly any ritual or observable intention in the blessing of the wafer and cup. About six lay people handed out the wafers (which may have been sprinkled beforehand with the contents of the cup). In short it was a shemozzle.

That is why we need a "science of the sacraments".

One thing I have found is that modern churches are very similar. They usually have a projector of some sort and the order of service is much the same.

Perhaps if one was looking for tradition, the Orthodox churches are the way to go.

As Rudolf Steiner observed, when folk were running off to India for enlightenment, it would have been better if they had headed off to Mt. Athos.

-Bruce

Anonymous said...

Dear Roger,
It was a delight to find your peice on the Eucharist.
Here's something for you about Jung.When i read his
account of transubstantiation in his
essay on alchemy I was profoundly moved.To me it was the greatest and most faith-full account which I had ever read. I think it played its part in drawing me back to his body.
I do find a kind of reticence to talk about the actuality of the Eucharistic event which is partly understandable,but prehaps there comes a time when we must.
I don't know how these blog things work so don't know if you can respond if you wish to.
But I have a website which is
gerardmanleyhopkins.com
Or atelier@onetel.com
God bless
Sean oleary

Anonymous said...

Dear Roger. Try drinking 8 glasses of water a day, going to a massage therapist and in general get into shape. From a fellow healer.

Xeniteia.

Anonymous said...

Communion is one of the deep mysteries of Christianity. We encounter it in a group and yet we encounter it privately. It strikes me as a tender moment, where God ministers to each as is needed. To some, it may well seem that there is little happening beyond the act of consuming. For others, on occasion, there is profound insight and change. Speaking for myself, I must believe by faith that the times where there is no special feeling that the communion is a time that is valuable, even if I may feel embarassed to say that I did not have a mountain-top experience. I am still in the presence of God and linked to the body of believers.

Sometimes, God is planting a seed. There is a time in which that seed is hidden, and properly so, in the ground. Even when we feel the first stirrings of germination, it is equally proper to keep silence. Maybe that was what the man in the paper was doing - there is something going on within me, he thinks, but I am not ready or maybe even not able to say more.

Please be well and I hope to see you again soon.