Friday, March 17, 2006

Confessions – Part I (Introduction)

Dear Friends, Known and Unknown,

For weeks now, it has been a very, very trying and painful time on all levels. Practical, emotional, spiritual.

And in the midst of this ongoing trial, I found myself, some days ago, writing yesterday’s entry – which has a far more personal tone than much of the material that has appeared hitherto in this weblog.

At the time, I was seriously feeling I might have to give up this project. At least temporarily.

But inwardly it felt wrong to stop – and I have found, almost miraculously, a way to continue, which feels right.

Over the space of just a few hours, I found myself writing a long piece that will now be serialised here, under the title ‘Confessions’.

I use this term for several reasons. One is to indicate a point of departure. For the next days at least, this weblog will take a far more personal turn. Though it will not address personal events in my life, it will focus on issues in this weblog – including the world situation, world spirituality and the Church – in a more personal way.

Another reason I use the term 'confessions' is that I deliberately want to call attention to the fact that, while previously I presented much material that I pondered and researched over years – the following will be a little different.

Some of it, for example, will be very fresh material emerging in my mind. Things that I have not researched sufficiently yet, to present in the previous format.

Instead, I only want to say, I confess, dear friends, I confess, this is how the world appears to me at the moment. These are also 'confessions' as to my concerns, and as to what drives me in this effort …

Under this heading of 'confessions', I am going to say a number of controversial things about Christianity, the New Age movement, the World Soul as I see them.

I am going to go further than before. Go further, as I look out at the growing suffering of the world, suffering under a soulless, secularist and capitalist system.

And as I contemplate the developments, decades down the line, if the present trajectory continues to amplify in its effects …

I will go further in saying why this contemplation leads me personally to an ever more traditional position, an ever more traditional Catholicism. Even as I strive for a traditional Catholicism, which is deeply open-hearted, respectful of other traditions and socially and environmentally engaged.

And why, for example, I cannot help but feel New Age attempts to replace the tradition of the West are inadequate to the task at hand and fatally flawed - rooted as they often now seem to me, in ignorance of the tradition, reductionistic psychologising and a hermeneutic of suspicion. Rather than profound and rigorous reflection …

And why I feel it is my painful duty to raise these issues …

And what I see the alternatives are.

Though nothing **comprehensive** is promised and what is in store will be very personal and fragmentary, this at least gives indications of what will be forthcoming.

Please note the refrains here: about appearances and feelings. How things feel and appear to me.

These are my confessions. Confessions as I look out on the modern state of the Soul of Humanity and its spiritual and religious **needs**. Or at least, what it seems to me, is so burningly needed in our world - after years of struggling with these issues.

Yes, in all these matters, I struggle to clarify and sharpen my thinking. And perhaps some of you, who struggle too, can help me.

(Comments to this weblog are very gratefully received. I work necessarily in a certain darkness, as I send out these messages. Believing in them, but having little idea as to their reception - beyond the fact that a silent majority seem to visit here every day. For which I am very grateful.)

These confessions should resume in earnest on Monday. May your weekend, dear friends, be blessed, inspired and meaningful.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

dear friend..‘Well known’….

I received your first ‘around letter’ before Christmas…through Robert Powell whom I have been a student for (already!) 10 years, and it was a blow of fresh air …. My life story is very much similar to your …and of some of others authors that belong to the “Western Shores” … been a Antroposoph for 30 years, since I was very young, I asked to my Bishop to be baptize 7 years ago after I translated the Tarot book into Italian . I am French, live in Italy and did this major work as a thanks to the land of Italy that I appreciate so much… and to give to my Italian friends the same help I myself received from that book and its Author. This decision has been spiritually the major one I did in my entire life, and has been ‘dictated’ by an ‘intervention’ of the ‘Lady of All Peoples’ directly in my biography.
I hope that my mail will arrive, I am not a specialist with blogs …I write to thanks you for your initiative, and to tell to you and to your friends that I personally have had much of the same thoughts and experiences you describe… most of the time I feel so isolated on one side from my ex antroposophist friends whom are miles of distance , and of course from most of my new catholic friends….so please feel my spiritual presence. I have the sensation that you are not my unknown friend but that I have know you from ever and ever.
Also a small group of us is working on writings that integrate the Tradition of Christianity and the work of Steiner - Tomberg….we write in Italian…. And your contributions are precious for us , so I prey on your Head for you receive every day all the blessings you need to find the forces to go on for your initiative.
The blessing of Christ and Sophia be on you and your Land.

Roger Buck said...

Dear Michèle,

Thank you for this most sincere and kind post. It moves me very deeply.

I am very moved to hear of your journey, your contribution to Italy, which can bring so, so, SO much ...

I am moved by your kindness to myself. It definitely helps me at this time.

I won't say much more in this space - but if you'd care to let me have an e-mail address for you, I would be grateful.

I am also very with the Lady of all peoples - and developments in my life seem to be leading me deeply in the direction of both your native land, language and the Catholic and Hermetic traditions thereof. I was recently in Paray-le-Monial and the Sacre Coeur de Montmartre.

And deeply moved. In connection with our common Friend ...

I am also grateful to hear of the work of you and your group (I wish I could read Italian -but French is taking all the little spare time I have at present!)

As I say, I prefer not to say more in this space, except that I am very grateful for your kind encouragement and prayers, Michèle - and if you want to let me have a contact for you -

My e-mail is:

sophialiebhaber@yahoo.com

With my gratitude, warmth and prayers for you and your group in your work.

Roger

Michael said...

Hi Roger,
Did you ever consider that Christ is the New Age?
Surely it has been hijacked i.e. the so-called New Age movement.

Did you ever study the works of David Spangler when you were in Findhorn?

-Bruce

Michael said...

Aha,
I see in the next post that you did indeed read Spangler.

What do you think of his Luciferian doctrines? Of course Alice Bailey was so inclined as well.

Dr. Steiner said that H.P.B. was made to feel that Lucifer was the true benefactor of mankind.

Why is this so?

-Bruce

Roger Buck said...

Hi Bruce,

Thank you. I think you raise the profoundest of issues here.

Issues I have been struggling with for years - reading and re-reading David Spangler, Alice Bailey, etc.

And yet after all this struggle, I confess I find myself not yet competent to address the issues with the subtlety and clarity they deserve.

Too many Anthroposophists I fear may be leaping to conclusions about David Spangler.

David Spangler has stated that Bailey was not his source. His inspiration came through his own spiritual efforts.

And I have no reason to doubt his sincerity or integrity. Quite the reverse in fact - he impressed me on the occasions I met him.

At the same time, I must confess the 'spiritual politics' of his John material, particularly the first 1980 Conversations with John, do seem to me to be clearly linked to the politics of the Bailey stream.

And very, very different from the inspiration of Rudolf Steiner.

How conscious of this David Spangler is, is impossible for me to judge.

These are issues that demand deep clarification. Much more than nearly any of us seem to realise. I struggle. I really struggle.

I feel a need to be very careful here in my thinking - so I will not say more here, yet. I need greater maturity in this area.

It may be you can help me, here, Bruce. Though I've read most of Steiner's lectures in English on Blavatsky - I would love to have a reference for what you say.

And to hear your further thoughts.

When my personal life gets a bit easier, I might also contact you about this, off this site.

Again, I really believe you raise profoundly important issues. And I warmly thank you.

Michael said...

Dear Roger,
I think that quote about Blavatsky is in 'The Occult Movement in the Nineteenth Century' (there are some mistakes in that book which are leapt upon by the Theosophists).

I don't know how much you want me to say about Lucifer on this blog, but there are perfectly good reasons why these folks would think he is such a good guy.

Have you heard of Fr. Jason Spadafore? He was with the mainstream Church for a while:
http://www.geocities.com/athaumaturgus/index.htm
He is a fan of Eliphas Levi too, if I remember rightly.

I wonder if you have contacted Bruce McCausland? He was in Findhorn as well. He used to be quite active on the internet.
Bobby Maherne has his study guide on his site:

http://www.doyletics.com/guide.htm

He has entries for Lucifer there.

David Spangler gets it the wrong way around- the Light does not come from Lucifer.

"He (Lucifer) is not THE LIGHT, but lives out from this Light, His Light, Christ’s Light, and is brought forth by it, is carried with it, and does show all of his treasures by that same light –"

Warmly,
Bruce

Roger Buck said...

Dear Bruce,

THANK YOU for this.

Almost no time to follow this up right now - so many pressing demands.

But in time I definitely shall.

And I believe you could be opening doors for me.

Again, thank you.

Roger

Anonymous said...

Warm greetings in the True Christmas Spirit!

I hope all is well, you seem very knowledgeable. I read through your blogs--very sharp indeed! Do you have a Doctorate in Divinity or Philosophy?

Anyhow, I was wondering if you could give some priceless advice. I am thinking of buying a some good old Catholic theology books for some family members and loved ones, and well, I recently received an advertisement for this very interesting book called "Communicatio in Sacris: The Roman Catholic Church against Intercommunion of non-Catholics" by Mr. William J. DeTucci.

I was wondering if you have seen any book review on this book? I could not find anything on the author. It seems the book talks about the Role of Vatican II in the Modern World and how some Traditionalists have resisted many of the Modernistic teachings of Ecumenism, Religious Liberty, and the New Mass, as opposed to the old Latin Tridentine Mass. However, I also recently read Benedict XVI's Motu Proprio ( www.vatican.va), which seems to be give the Liberty of "Open Communion" to so-called Traditional Catholic Groups who dissent from Vatican II, i.e. Marcel Lefebvre's SSPX, Mark Pivarunas' CMRI, Clarence Kelly's SSPV, Br. Michael Dimond's Most Holy Family Monastery, the various Saint Benedict Centers, Jason Spadafore's Raphael Society, Patrick Taylor's Society of the Virgin Mary, and so many other Independent Bishops at Large)--all who promote Intercommunion Latin Mass Ritual, of course! I think the Spirit of Vatican II is really being recognized now by many of the Traditionalists who once followed Bishop Lefebvre in resisting Vatican II Conciliar Reforms, but since the Motu Proprio Latin Mass Ecumenism has been widely promoted and it has been "well received" by many of these same various Traditionalists Sects and also by many Liberal Bi-Ritual Bishops who offer both the Latin Mass and Ecumenical Modern Liturgies.

However, breaking the rule of judging a book by its cover, and only peaking its table of contents, it seems to me this book is an itchy reaction to this Neo-Ecumenism that both Greek and Latin Churches have been involved with. Not sure if you have read the book, or know of some theologian who has written a review? Here is the link to the contents that I browsed:

http://www.lulu.com/content/1431544

and also here:

http://www.vladcatholic.com

I would most greatly appreciate any book review that you or a theologian has done. This book seems to have positive merit in as much it claims to be "a Compendium of Roman Catholic Doctrine on the subject of Intercommunion with non-Catholics. This book produces the overwhelming theological consensus for the Dogmatic Teaching condemning Intercommunion with non-Catholics, putting together a treasury of Sacred Scriptures, Church Fathers, Doctors, Saints, Theologians, and Popes who have written on the matter."

However, I just wanted to verify that before I make my last minute shopping for this Christmas & New Year Season.

May God bless you all!

Kind regards,

Patty

Anonymous said...

very useful post. I would love to follow you on twitter. By the way, did anyone know that some chinese hacker had busted twitter yesterday again.